Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Allow pipe delivery methods to be defined from a cookbook/role. #100

Conversation

waterkip
Copy link

I needed a new delivery method added to master.cf, this wasn't supported by the cookbook. Added support.

@chef-supermarket
Copy link

Hi. I am an automated pull request bot named Curry. There are commits in this pull request whose authors are not yet authorized to contribute to Chef Software, Inc. projects or are using a non-GitHub verified email address. To become authorized to contribute, you will need to sign the Contributor License Agreement (CLA) as an individual or on behalf of your company. You can read more on Chef's blog.

GitHub Users Who Are Not Authorized To Contribute

The following GitHub users do not appear to have signed a CLA:

Please sign the CLA here.

@waterkip
Copy link
Author

waterkip commented Mar 5, 2015

Weird, because I signed it..

@thommay
Copy link

thommay commented Jun 23, 2015

@waterkip Hi, and sorry for the delay. I'd love to get this merged, but please can you make sure your github id is linked to your supermarket account so that your CLA signature shows up? (Hit https://supermarket.chef.io/profile/link-github to make it happen.)

@chef-supermarket
Copy link

Hi. Your friendly Curry bot here. Just letting you know that all commit authors have become authorized to contribute. I have added the "Signed CLA" label to this issue so it can easily be found in the future.

@waterkip
Copy link
Author

I have a signed ICLA, but resigned it.

@tas50 tas50 removed the Signed CLA label Jan 5, 2017
@tas50
Copy link
Contributor

tas50 commented Mar 6, 2017

We've reworked the way the configuration occurs in Postfix and given the user the ability to pass in a lot more arbitrary data. At this PR may not be necessary. I'm going to close it out at this point. If you think the functionality is still valid take a look at the current code in master and update the PR to reflect the changes there.

@tas50 tas50 closed this Mar 6, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants